| Title |
Anapus administracinių kriterijų: kokybės atpažinimo aspektai humanitariniuose moksluose / |
| Translation of Title |
Beyond administrative criteria: the patterns of the recognition of quality in the humanities. |
| Authors |
Kirtiklis, Kęstas ; Gedutis, Aldis |
| DOI |
10.15388/SocMintVei.2022.1.38 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas.. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla. 2022, t. 50, Nr. 1, p. 66-79.. ISSN 1392-3358. eISSN 2335-8890 |
| Keywords [eng] |
humanities ; quality of research ; novelty ; excellence ; impact |
| Abstract [eng] |
The present article seeks to discern the criteria or the quality of research, formulated and accepted within the scholarly community of the humanities. We argue that the scholars implicitly use these criteria opposing administrative evaluation. The analysis of these criteria revealed that they might be summarized in three broad categories – the novelty (originality, innovativeness) of the research; the excellence of the researcher (ability to conduct and describe the research); and the impact (academic as well as social-political). We argue that relevant criteria for the administrative evaluation of research in the humanities should draw on these perspectives. |
| Published |
Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
Lithuanian |
| Publication date |
2022 |
| CC license |
|
