| Abstract [eng] |
Classical dynamics optimization methods of the electromechanical servo drives are the quantitative and symmetrical optimums. These methods have advantages and disadvantages and are based on the fixed structure velocity controllers – proportional (P) and proportional-integrating (PI). In order to coordinate the advantages and eliminate disadvantages of the quantitative and symmetrical optimum methods have been investigated the P-PI variable structure velocity controller in the electromechanical servo drive. The P-PI variable structure velocity controller ensures that the dynamic error does not exceed 5 % and enables avoiding the static velocity error. According to the ITAE (Integral of Time multiplied by Absolute Error) quality indicator it was determined the control law switching parameter dependence on the static load ensuring the best dynamical quality of the electromechanical servo system. The investigations have been accomplished simulating the electromechanical servo system with P-PI variable structure velocity controller using MATLAB/Simulink program. It has been determined that P-PI variable structure velocity controller ensures from 60,7 % to 83,15 % better dynamical quality of the electromechanical servo system compared to the fixed structure controller (PI) of the symmetrical optimum. But using P-PI variable structure velocity controller the dynamical quality declines from 2,76 % to 13,67 % compared to the PI-P-PI variable structure velocity controller. |
