| Abstract [eng] |
This paper analyzes the interplay of first and third person perspectives in Integrated information theory (IIT). It is argued that there are six main interpretations of IIT that combine these perspectives differently. Paper consists of two main parts. First part analyzes methodological problems of IIT, second is intended for the classification of IIT interpretations, for the analysis of their interplay and for the arguments against integrated information and consciousness identity thesis. This work demonstrates that interpretations that refuse identity thesis are better supported by empirical research, also they resist some conceptual problems, cohere better with surrounding theories and are neutral towards some ontological problems. |
