| Abstract [eng] |
The main task of this master work was to explore the psychological aspects and juridical basics of a minor suspect interrogation. Interrogation of the minor suspect in the pretrial period is one of the main methods ,from which the further success of the inquest will depend on,and it takes a lot of time to prepare for this process.It is too difficult to be ready for the interrogation without special knowledge of psychology and without special readiness,because there will appear psycological barrier between minor suspect and the investigator. Now difficulties will appear in finding psychological contact ,and so the doubts in evidence value can appear. Therefore the criminalistic value of the evidences of minor suspectare very valuable,because these evidences are significant means to detect crimes they are suspected in. This theme is quite actuall, but it is too little examined an there are not enough methodic recommendations for the pretrial investigators,who work with the minor suspects. There are too little methodic recommendations concerning minor suspect interrogation procedure. Also,there is no special clause in Penal Procedural Code,that regulated the inquiring procedure of the minor suspect. The main focus of the crime ,made by the minors is not the criminal as such,but more focus on the minor suspect as a person of law(what led him to the crime,how he appreciates his behaviour).That is why the interrogation of the minors is quite difficult ,it has many specific aspects determined by age paculiarity,by mind distintion of kids and teenagers, that manifests in various manner due to their nervous system development,living ,tutorial and communication surraundings. That is why ,the interrogation of the minors ,must have additional procedural guaratees ,that will safeguard the unprejudical process. There is used abig complex of tactical methods,based on psychological links between the investigator and minor suspect.Such tactical way ,as formating psychological contact,analysis of the evidences is used in everyday situation. But there is too difficult to hope to get right evidences without good contact and link between minor and the investigator. Witnout such contact and analysis of all testimonys it is impossible to establish evidence trueness and valuableness,to determine the position of a person in the pretrial investigation. |
