| Abstract [eng] |
AIM OF STUDY To evaluate and compare quality of life in patient‘s after duadenal perforated ulcer laparoscopic and open surgery repair. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS 25 patients participated in study. The study was carried on 12 patients who had duadenal perforated ulcer laparoscopic and 13 open surgery repair managed in Vilnius University Emergency hospital between 1996 and 2004. Quality of life was assessed using WHOQOL–100 Questionnaire. Statistical data analysis performed using SPSS 12.0.1 analystical software. RESULTS In group with laparoscopically managed perforated ulcer 50,0 % of respondents assessed their quality of life as neither poor nor good, and 33,3 % as good. In group of open surgery managed perforated ulcer 53,8 % of respondents assessed their quality of life as neither poor nor good, and 38,5 % as good. CONCLUSIONS The results showed that quality of life in both groups was statistically equal and in most cases assessed as neither poor nor good. |
