| Abstract [eng] |
MIZEIKYTĖ, Jolanta. (2009) Teamwork and Groupwork Influence on Organization Activity. MBA Graduation Paper. Kaunas: Kaunas Faculty of Humanities, Vilnius University. 72 p. SUMMARY Recently, increasingly need to hear the concept of teamwork and group work. This is because the latter concept is becoming a regular business by satellite, providing a competitive advantage. Job object - teamwork and group work. The aim - to examine team and group influence on the organization of work activities. Master work, the objective is addressed in the following tasks: 1. to consider the team and group work on theoretical aspects; 2. analyze the team and working group differences; 3. analyze the team and the team level of empirical testing; 4. on the basis of theoretical and empirical work team and group analysis, maximizing the effectiveness of a working group and team work model; 5. make team and group work to maximize the performance of the model and empirical assessment team to identify and block the efficiency of Lithuanian organizations. Formulated hypotheses. - The organization's success depends on employees' work, carried out jointly with the other members of the organization (work group or team); - Workgroups meet members are encouraged to guide, depending on the complexity of the task; - Team work efficiency has the greatest impact on the number of members. Conclusions: 1. The analysis of team-work and group differences, it can be argued that the outside group, and the team does not have substantial differences. The main difference is that the members of the group to work individually and carry out their whole forms a single work. 2. After the theoretical and empirical team and a group work analysis was formed by maximizing the effectiveness of group and teamwork model. Promoting the efficiency of group and teamwork model shows that the most effective work in the formation of the team, but it is effective only if the transition team are all stages of formation. Otherwise, each member will not be achieved, and with all the organization's overall goal. 3. After the team and group work to maximize the performance of empirical evaluation of the model can be argued that even 59% of polled respondents carried out individually. This is because the organizations investigated are divided into structural units, but nevertheless most of the respondents surveyed are workers, even as other officials. 37% of polled respondents carried out in groups, and this category includes management positions concerned corporate respondents. Work consists of an introduction, 3 parts, conclusions and recommendations. The main substance is described in 72 pages, including 19 tables and 20 images. Bibliography includes 69 sources. |
