| Abstract [eng] |
XIX-XX century junctions, and the twentieth century the beginning in Lithuania formed typological literature research, criticism, was to settle the essence of art, originality, problem, and do not dispute. In this context, as one of the most active reformers Lithuanian literature, there Balys Sruoga and Jurgis Savickis. So the goal - to recognize the art criticism of the reform of Sruoga and Savickis creation. 1. The first task of the work - to provide the philosophy of art intuitivism features. 2. The second task of this work - to analyze the literary theories and methods in the understanding of B. Sruoga criticism. 3. The third task - to reveal the art concept of B. Sruoga criticism. 4. The fourth task of working out J. Savickis assessments of his creative; to reveal features of the modern artist's creativity, to explore the J. Savickas creative source of innovation. The work led to the following conclusions. 1. Intuitive philosophy of art, the art world and the intuitive understanding of knowledge in the set, emerged as a reaction to the rationalist and positive ideas institutionalized. These early-oriented – H. Bergson and B. Croce. 2. B. Sruoga highlights the main achievements of the literature of science challenges the substance and the form should be examined analytically, biographical and historical, and only after all of this work can be assessed. Evaluation of a work of art, according to B. Sruoga requires constant spiritual renewal, because the art work is open to various interpretations. Allotting philological, aesthetic, biographical-psychological and cultural-historical approaches Sruoga express their views on the works of the language, style and context reveals the importance of their understanding of the substance and form of unity, the psychological things, the aesthetic value of the determination of the complexity. 3. Works of B. Sruoga divided into the conscious and the unconscious. Himself closer to automatic art. Meanwhile, it is very close to intuitive school. Of the lyric B. Sruoga requires inspiration, the expressions power, a sense of purity, volatility of thought, form and content of the synthesis. But poetry can not be mechanical, the poet must survive. Sruoga thinking is a particularly striking modernity, avant-garde as racionalistic doubt classicist and traditions, individual artistic identity fredom, expression aspect of the routine work of foms requires the rejection of the radical reform of the art. 4. J. Savickas novels crucial in the context of the evaluations and opinions, not only in their speech era, but nowadays. The creator of many books of his literary contemporaries seemed unusually innovative, and confusing. However, Savickas works, however, the context and enthusiastic supporters. One of them - B. Sruoga. Maximum Savickis creative innovation is that the creator of her work, highlighting what is unconscious, irrational, and the will of the uncontrolled mind. Savickas story mode does not meet the objective in the usual classical epic tale tone of the birth of a new Savickis novel form. Savickis prosaic demonstrates a new technique, in rejecting the established Stencil write another novel and creating the world. Savickis play images, perspectives, interest details, and especially style. From the traditional Lithuanian prosaic different and novel topics. It is away from the rural to recent Lithuanian literature world-view and realistic and the romantic literary tradition. Savickis its növelése a new urban, upper-class culture topic. The creator of the Lithuanian literature "bring" modern civilization man - ironic, skeptical, affected gloomy environment, the weak, no higher ideals and unpredictable behavior. It raises new human noveles - marionette motif. Savickis innovative creative origin had a significant impact on the Russian and Polish culture. It is also Savickis identified himself as a painter, very interested in theater. |
