| Abstract [eng] |
The goal of the master’s thesis is to analyze the legal regulation of multi-family houses and other purpose buildings and compare the implementation of co-owners property rights into common property objects. The study examines the legal institution of partial common property of co-owners in multi-family houses and other purpose buildings. It has been established that multi-family houses and other purpose buildings, which are used like multi-family houses, share common features and legal elements that align both buildings at the legal status level. The private interest of co-owners of multi-family houses and other purpose buildings is identical – adhering to public law requirements and implementing property rights while using legislative instruments (whether mandatory or voluntary in choosing building management forms) to coordinate mutual interests on a democratic principle, making decisions by majority vote regarding the use, management, and maintenance of common property. Older legal acts do not meet the current need for regulation of the co-owners relationships due to legal gaps; in buildings of other purposes, the specific provisions of Civil Code Articles 4.82–4.85 and/or the norms of the Associations Act are not always fully applicable. The problematic aspects highlighted in the thesis will likely be partially resolved and regulated by the upcoming new edition of the Associations Act and the regulation of CC Articles 4.75, 4.82, 4.83, 4.84, and 4.85, extending their applicability to buildings of other purposes and their co-owners. |
