| Abstract [eng] |
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the long-term outcomes of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) as a treatment option for obesity based on a comprehensive review of clinical data and patient follow-ups spanning several years. LAGB, known for its minimally invasive approach and adjustability, presents itself as an option of bariatric surgery for weight management. The primary focus of this systemic review lies in the significant differences in outcomes of the analyzed papers. Excess weight loss percentages of 16.9 to 68.1% are extensive margins that should be analyzed regarding their differences in the clinical setting. Due to the variability in the weight loss outcomes, with some patients experiencing weight regain over extended follow-up periods, it is essential to highlight the various outcomes. This systemic review also examines the procedure's complications, which vary from case to case. Band slippage, dilations, and the need for revisional surgeries were noted as significant concerns. These complications will be discussed, as well as the surgery techniques and comprehensive postoperative care used. In recent years, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has become less popular and has received less recent research than other bariatric procedures. LAGB has advantages and disadvantages and can be a viable weight loss option for certain patients, though it is mainly praised in shorter terms. It does require a committed approach to postoperative care and lifestyle changes from the patient. After careful patient selection and management of potential complications, it might be a viable option to optimize long-term success, not just the short-term, when given the right circumstances. |
