| Abstract [eng] |
This thesis explores common factors of effective psychotherapeutic supervision from the perspective of supervisors representing different psychotherapy paradigms. The aim of the study was to reveal how supervisors understand effective supervision and which processes and conditions they associate with its effectiveness. The study involved six supervisors from different psychotherapy paradigms with long-term supervisory experience. A qualitative research design was employed using semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings revealed that, despite theoretical differences between psychotherapy paradigms, supervisors identified similar common factors of effective supervision. Effective supervision was described as a dialogical and reflection-based process in which a safe supervisory relationship, collaborative exploration of the therapeutic process, clear structure, and an atmosphere fostering professional growth were considered important. Participants emphasized the importance of emotional safety, a trust-based relationship, an accepting supervisory stance, a clear process framework, preparation for supervision, and the discussion of clinical material. Supervision effectiveness was associated with a deeper understanding of the client and the therapeutic process, increased reflexivity, and the professional growth of both the supervisee and the supervisor. The findings of this study may be relevant for the development of supervision practice, supervisor training, and further research on supervision effectiveness. |
