| Abstract [eng] |
Master's thesis deals with one of the types of market abuse – a prohibition on the marketing of insider information. Disclosing regulation of prohibition of insider information to trade in European Union, after the new European Union Regulation 595/2014 entered into force, in order to increase more transparent trading in financial instruments. European Union and Lithuanian regulation, compared with the world's largest financial market owner- the United States and where is highlighted the differences and similarities in order to identify a new regulatory effectiveness and potential drawbacks in European Union. It also highlighted the existing weaknesses or similarities between the protection of the investors, when there was a breach of prohibition of insider trading in financial instruments, compared with quite long established practice in the United States with the new regulation in the European Union and Lithuania. Highlighting different investors activity in the European Union and the Member States, and in the United States, in order to recover the losses, when there is a breach of the prohibition to use inside information. In Lithuania and in European Union investors' passivity defending their rights after the breach of their financial interest in comparing with United States, is more higher, because of that in this master’s thesis, is disclosed potential investors remedies in order to protect investors rights in Lithuania, who have suffered from the breach of prohibition to use inside information and also disclosing European Union position on this aspect. Insider Trading Prohibition in EU Law. |
