| Title |
Socialinių santykių bizantiškosios civilizacijos šalyse VII-XIV amžiuje tipologijos metmenys / |
| Translation of Title |
An outline of typology of social relations in the countries of Byzantine civilization in the VII-XIV centuries. |
| Authors |
Nerijus, Babinskas |
| DOI |
10.15388/LIS.2005.37105 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
Lietuvos istorijos studijos.. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla. 2005, t. 16, p. 9-18.. ISSN 1392-0448 |
| Keywords [eng] |
Byzantine civilization ; social relations ; VII-XIV centuries |
| Abstract [eng] |
The main concepts which the author operates in his attempt to describe typologically a type of social relations in the area of Byzantine civilization in the Middle ages are: an Asiatic mode of production, a slave mode of production, feudalism and so called semi-feudalism. According to E. Gudavicius there were two ways of historical development of the humankind: the main one (exstensive) and the exceptional one (intensive). Absolute majority of civilisations developed towards the pattern of the main way. The first exception was the Ancient Greece in the archaic period (VIII-VI century BC). The most important thing was that the idea of private property was born during that period. The Rome also continued to develop in this direction but at the end of antiquity it reached the deadlock (during the barbarian invasions in IV-V century AD). Nevertheless the Roman ruins were "radioactive": Germanic tribes became acquainted with the idea of the private property. Because of that the allodial property of land and a holding of individual producer was born. So the exceptional way of production had reborn and had acquired a new quality. As a contrast the productive cell of civilisations of the main way remained community. There have been no private property. Such a kind of societies were ruled by a despot or a board of priests. These are the main features of Asiatic mode of production. According to E. Gudavicius, the type of social structure characteristic to Byzantine Empire and Russia could be described as semi-feudal. There were latifundia in the Byzantium but the owners of these latifundia exploited not the individual holdings of peasants but the whole communities. So the social structure of Byzantine Empire remained transmixed between the slave and the feudal mode of production. There was the same mixed model in Russia as in Byzantium. The ruling minority possessed private property but peasants had no private property (it belonged to community) though they had individual holdings. The ruler of Russia was even more autocratic than the Byzantine emperor. The countries of Southeastern Europe adopted political as well as socio-cultural structure of the Byzantine Empire: the state was centralized, the church was subordinated to the state, the aristocracy did not rely on private property. |
| Published |
Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
Lithuanian |
| Publication date |
2005 |
| CC license |
|
