| Title |
Sovietinės lietuvių istoriografijos raidos lūžių paieškos: 1956 metai (?) / |
| Translation of Title |
Search for the turning points in the Soviet Lithuanian historiography: 1956 (?). |
| Authors |
Švedas, Aurimas |
| DOI |
10.15388/LIS.2007.37039 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
Lietuvos istorijos studijos. 2007, t. 19, p. 139-149.. ISSN 1392-0448 |
| Abstract [eng] |
The XX Congress of the Soviet Union Communist Party which took place in February 1956 became symbol of radical reforms in the Soviet Union. Liberation processes started in many fields of the totalitarian state: in political and social life, in culture, in science and art. New changes rapidly reached allied soviet republics where "thaw" also began. This article raises the question: Was the year 1956 the beginning of new discourses, polemics and "revolt" against old methodological-ideological postulates in the soviet Lithuanian historiography? The illusion of possible changes in history research in 1956 was created by Lithuanian Communist Party (LCP) itself which organized several meetings with Lithuanian intellectuals discussing the short history of Soviet Lithuania prepared by the History Institute. The Central Committee Bureau of LCP wanted to find out whether the official discourse introduced by the Bureau and by director of the Institute Ziugzda follows the requirements of new conditions and whether this discourse is resistant to the possible accuses for political and ideological "mistakes" which could have come from Moscow. The intents of Central Committee of LCP were misunderstood by some humanitarians who, during the general session of Science Academy in February 1956, tried to provoke the discussion on the current situation in History Institute and to propose new director of the Institute. Elite of LCP ruined the possibility of radical changed by supporting Ziugzda and his scientific opponents were accused with "bourgeois nationalism". For this reasons the year 1956 in Lithuanian soviet historiography did not become the beginning of radical changes but rather the period of status quo. With the changes of soviet system this status quo also altered gradually giving for historians more "freedom of manoeuvre". However we could not speak about quick and essential "thaw" in the soviet Lithuanian historiography after 1956. |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
Lithuanian |
| Publication date |
2007 |
| CC license |
|
