| Title |
Lietuvių vienaskaitos pirmojo ir antrojo asmens klitinių įvardžių formos XVII a. raštuose |
| Another Title |
First and the second person singular pronominal clitics in the 17th century Lithuanian texts. |
| Authors |
Razanovaitė, Auksė |
| DOI |
10.15388/baltistica.49.1.2207 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
Baltistica.. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla. 2014, t. 49, Nr. 1, p. 41-70.. ISSN 0132-6503 |
| Abstract [eng] |
The truth is that some cases of preverbal positions and the examples, where a pronominal clitic is adjacent not to the first stressed word of a clause, and which is not a verb form, reinforce the impression of the disintegration of the system. As it was mentioned above, the first and the second person pronominal clitics tend to stay adjacent to a verb (even if the verb is not the first word of a clause), so pronominal clitics defy the phonological feature to go in the second position in a sentence. It is also interesting that in attaching the verb forms they do not show a vivid distribution with the corresponding accented forms of the pronoun. The only tangible motivated usage can be seen in poetry texts. |
| Published |
Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
Lithuanian |
| Publication date |
2014 |
