| Title |
Virtuality and the problem of agency in Object-Oriented Ontology / |
| Authors |
Baranovas, Ruslanas |
| DOI |
10.1515/opphil-2020-0106 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
Open philosophy: Topical issue: imagination and potentiality: the quest for the real / edited by Graham Harman and Kristupas Sabolius.. Warsaw : De Gruyter. 2020, vol. 3, iss. 1, p. 233-241.. eISSN 2543-8875 |
| Keywords [eng] |
Object-Oriented Ontology ; virtuality ; agency ; Harman ; Bryant ; Latour ; realism ; determination |
| Abstract [eng] |
In his Prince of Networks, Graham Harman reconstructs Latourian critique of concepts of potentiality and virtuality with which he claims to agree. This seems striking because Latour’s arguments seem to be exactly those Harman rejects in his other writings as overmining. Furthermore, this critique of potentiality and virtuality creates a dividing line between Harman and Bryant’s Democracy of Objects, where the concept of virtual plays a central role. In this article, I will explore this debate, focusing on how the concept of virtuality works in the context of the ontological realism that Object-Oriented Ontology is. To do this, I will first present Bryant’s notion of virtuality focusing on the problem of the individuality of the object. Then I will explore Latourian–Harmanian arguments against virtuality and show that the main issue Harman has with virtuality has to do with the agency of objects. Therefore, I claim that the main dividing line between Bryant’s and Harman’s versions of Object-Oriented Ontology is the difference between the two notions of agency. |
| Published |
Warsaw : De Gruyter |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
English |
| Publication date |
2020 |
| CC license |
|
