| Abstract [eng] |
Changes in Working Conditions at the Initiative of the Employer In the first part of the Master thesis, working conditions’ conception is analysed. Working conditions’ and work agreement terms are compared. The changed necessary work agreement conditions’ content is overviewed. The content analysis of different types of working conditions’, such as necessary work conditions, separate types of work agreements’ necessary conditions, additional work conditions and other work conditions, is given. Work conditions are distributed according to their importance for the work agreement validity and the necessity of written consolidation. In the second part of the Master thesis, the procedure of changing work conditions when the process is initiated by the employer is examined. Also, the principles which can be used to explain the legal regulation for the procedure of changing the working conditions are discussed. The procedure of employer initiating the change of work conditions is analysed and separated according to where the working conditions are consolidated. The current regulation for changing work conditions is compared to the older statutory one. Various problematic aspects are given and analysed, such as: employer changing work conditions in an extreme on quarantine situations; when the work payment condition is changed; how the necessary and other, equated to them, working conditions should be changed. It is analysed that the legislator has given a protection for the work payment condition. The problematic aspects of the necessary and other, equated to them, work agreement conditions’ are compared to other countries’ legal regulation and court practice. In the third part of the Master thesis, disputes which come from the employer changing work conditions are overviewed and systemized. The qualification of the circumstances of work disputes’ is given. The most common disputes are distinguished. The LAT made rules for tackling disputes in this area are given. Situations in which disputes have risen are overviewed and an opinion on how the disputes and negative consequences could have been avoided is given. |
