| Abstract [eng] |
V. Summary ‘‘Development of the monologue in Lithuanian dramaturgy“ In this study was analised the monologue in XIX century end – XXI century beginning dramaturgy. At the beginning of the work, conception of the monologue is given. In it different attitudes of dramatists to monologue is emphasized. Some dramatists think, that certain elements of monologue forms are negatyve, not acceptable (statics of thoughts and thinking, outburst of emotions) and the monologues in their dramas are not used often. The others think, that monologues have merit and use them in drama. A. Samulionis, P. Pavi give the classification of the monologues, though it is not detailed. In monologues problematics, themes of “Amateurish dramaturgy“ the realistic reality representing way (the dramas of Žemaitė, Keturakis, Vaižgantas) and romantic-patriotic (A. Fromas-Gužutis) are often used. The main functions of the monologue: informational, dinamical, pushing the act of the drama further, characterising the personage who is taking, structural-compositional. The orientation to poetry stilistics and genre of V.Krėvė, V. Mykolaitis-Putinas reveals in neoromantical drama: mithology, lyrism. In monologues distinct individualised characters are pictured in the historical dramaturgy. Of the middle of the XX century (J. Grušas, J. Marcinkevičius) the monologues show universal, crossing the concrete historical times problematics. The language is characterised with didactical tones, passionativenes. K. Saja continues universal existential problems, that senior generations have reflected. There are cruelness elements in the monologues of J. Glinskis dramas. The ideas in K. Saja works are expressed straight. The analised fragments of A. Škėma, K. Ostrauskas, A. Landsbergis dramas in the contest of the middle of the XX century dramaturgy are modern or even postmodern (K. Ostrauskas). In A. Škėma monologues experimentical researches best seen are in language level. The monologues of K. Ostrauskas A. Landsbergis are manipfold not only semanticaly, but also in expression means attitude (“theatre in theatre“ idea, metatekstuality). The implication is important in these texts. In the newest dramaturgy L. S. Černiauskaitė, S. Parulskis, M. Ivaškevičius poetical features of the monologues show dramaturgist‘s “confrontation“ with tradicional texts, tradicionaly painted tems, ideals and etc. This tendence decides the sincretism of dramas genres (the features of tragical comedy, absurdity). In L. S. Černiauskaitė, M. Ivaškevičius works monologues not just express the inner feelings of the characters, convey the ideas, but also are used as structural-composition elements – set in a frame the drama. |
