| Abstract [eng] |
In this master’s final paper it is analyzed the complex of the rights and duties of the pleader in the criminal process. With reference to the law, legal, nonfiction literature, courts praxis, comparative analyses of the regulation of foreign countries – Germany and Russia, examined expedience, the true meaning of the pleader, his possibilities during the whole criminal process. This final paper expounds in theory and praxis mostly debate raising questions on appropriate structural parts. The preparation of the pleader to aver in criminal process asserts on his right to meet with defensive in confidence and acquaint with the procedural files. Participating in criminal prosecution or justice institution officer’s implemented investigatory action and collecting defensive excusing or amenability palliatives data by himself the pleader acts positively in pretrial. The rights of the pleader are secured by applying, appealing the procedural rulings of the officer, prosecutor and pretrial judge and expressing debar. The law provides to the parties of prosecution and defense equality and competitiveness principles in the judicial stage of the process. This final paper expounds what practical opportunities in showing evidence defense holds, disputes the meaning of the pleader’s final word in the criminal process and his right to appeal judgments in the order of appellate and cassation. |
