| Abstract [eng] |
In this paper analyzed specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, employers and disabled people attitude towards vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity and necessity. Stated hypothesis from two sections: It is presupposed, that minds of specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, employers and disabled people let assess priorities of vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity in process of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled. It is presupposed, that specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, employers and disabled people are inclined to agree with necessity of vocational rehabilitation specialist in process of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled. It is important to note that the interrogatory by filling in the form is also under the consideration how specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation and employers assess vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity and necessity. The fact-finding is also made and shown in statistics (descriptive frequency, the average, the percentage). The interrogatory by individual interview is also under the consideration how disabled people are inclined to assess vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity and necessity in workplace. The fact-finding is also made and shown in grounded theory. The presence of 100 specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, 100 employers and 16 disabled people caused a successful research. The most important empirical conclusions that were drawn here: 1.All three respondent groups who assess priorities of vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity most emphasize purpose of person working capacity repair, function of information offering, competence of communication and collaboration, ability to keep psychological with disabled people. 2.The results of investigation showed, that all three respondent groups are inclined to agree with necessity of vocational rehabilitation specialist in process of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled. 3.The investigation hypothesis (it is presupposed, that minds of specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, employers and disabled people let assess priorities of vocational rehabilitation specialist directiveness of activity in process of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled; it is presupposed, that specialists who work with the disabled in the process of vocational rehabilitation, employers and disabled people are inclined to agree with necessity of vocational rehabilitation specialist in process of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled) proved out. |
