| Abstract [eng] |
Compare the places of intersection of aesthetics and religion, work of art and religion experience. The most important thing is to stay within understanding of each piece of work. So in romanticism – aesthetics, work of art changes religion. However, we can deal with neokantizm of the twenties century, when ontologin origin does not exist in work of art. Aesthetical quality has negative meaning. In this work the connection of art work and religion experience has been researched. Comparison of understanding of work by Heidegger and Florensky. Leading the precondition, that work of art can be kind of frankness. Konception of Florensky is development of Heidegger work. The purpose is to find the answers: 1) Is ,,understanding” only the position of observation? 2) Is there anything unreached for interpretation in a work of art? Is art position opposing to subjectivism and can it liberate from subjective closeness. |
