| Abstract [eng] |
This paper is analysing what “indirect discrimination” stands for; and if there is a possibility to differentiate the subjects of Labour Law; what are the criteria based on which the differentiated treatment of subjects of Labour Law can be justified; and what is the difference between “differentiation” and “indirect discrimination”. By examining Lithuanian and European Union rules of Labour Law, it was aimed to provide the basis for determining indirect gender discrimination prohibition principles; furthermore, lay down assumptions for application of those principles in the field of wages - when concluding, implementing or ending a labour contract. Based on the leading case precedents of European Court of Justice, it has been attempted to clarify the characteristics of indirect discrimination. Attention has been paid to the ways of defending the violated rights of a person, who has experienced an indirect discrimination. This Master‘s paper has analysed if Lithuanian rules of Labour Law meet the requirements set out by the European Union rules of Labour Law, with regard to the implementation of indirect discrimination prohibition principle; key problems have been identified, and improvements suggested. |
