| Abstract [eng] |
There are a number of cases of corruption in nowadays society. Many business people are prone to giving bribes hoping that in 95 cases out of 100 it will help them to achieve their aims. Such practice as well as constantly increasing degrees of corruption apparently show that problem of corruption is relevant and has to be solved. The topic of final thesis is “Special Investigation Service (competence and activity practice)”. The aim of the thesis is to investigate STT activity and organizational structure that regulates legal base, reveal status of STT in the system of subjects of public administration, investigate STT practice of decision and action dispute. There are four basic parts of the final thesis, each of them (except the fourth) are divided into paragraphs and sections. In the first part author reveals specific status of STT in the system of subjects of public administration. Analysis of legal regulations and scientific literature stipulate a conclusion that STT can be characterized as having “multiple” status, i.e. being a legal institution, at the same time it is a subject of strategic activity, pre-trial investigation and public administration. In the system of subjects of public administration, STT is assigned to a group of special state institutions, specifically to national security ensuring, law enforcement, public administration subjects implementing legitimacy and justice. In the second part, author analyses organizational structure, competence, tasks and functions of STT. Analysis of legal regulations and STT activity reports, stipulates a well-founded conclusion, that main functions of STT are a disclosure of corruption crimes, corruption prevention and anticorruption education. In the third and fourth parts author presents peculiarities of STT decisions and activity disputing, practically evaluates activity of STT in recent years. At the end of those parts author concludes that even though activity of STT in recent years has become more active, still nowadays society is not informed where to go if you want to notify about a case of corruption. Society also has a negative opinion about the work of STT, as it has been analyzed in the practice of Supreme Board of Administrative Disputes and Supreme Administrative Court. |
