| Abstract [eng] |
The Summary of Master Thesis “The Judicial Review of European Union Acts Under Art. 230 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community” The analysis is being focused on the specific features of the Art. 230 of the Treaty establishing the European Community with the main purpose of enlightening the dual nature of the said Article. The above mentioned specialty is disclosed on the one hand by exhibiting the vast possibilities in proving the illegal nature of the European acts and on the other hand by detecting the rather constricted locus standi of non – privileged persons. This thesis highlights the importance of the role of Court of Justice by interpreting the meaning of the Art. 230 though the Court’s precedents, which are being claimed to be the main source divulging the purport of the said Article. The analysis reveals what kind of legal acts could be challenged under the Art. 230. However the main attention is directed to the grounds of illegality by revealing the rather liberal interpretation in respect of the whole Treaty’s system. Later the thesis unfolds manifestly constricted nature of the Treaty’s interpretation by disclosing the rules of the status of non – privileged persons. The thesis highlights the exigency of loosening the nature of interpretation arguing that it would be helpful in solving problems relating to the restrictive status of private persons and would make more obtainable the application of the Art. 230 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. It could be, at least temporally, the alternative way of amending the said Article however highly required in the modern European Union. The thesis is being finalized by revealing the remaining requirements for the admissibility of the action for annulment relating to the two months time limit given for challenging the illegality of the published or notified biding legal acts. So the final issue of the analysis uncloses the outcomes of the illegal acts. |
