| Abstract [eng] |
In this master work the cases regarding the reversal of disciplinary penalties according to the type of disciplinary penalties heard at Vilnius City District Courts during the year 2004 - 2006 is summarized. The procedural peculiarity in judging this type of cases is discussed too. Furthermore the author particularly analyses the law norms which consolidate the regulation of disciplinary liability. The work consists of three parts. In the first and second parts, theoretical disciplinary liability regulation questions referring on the grounds of the current legislation, explications provided by The Supreme Court of Lithuania are analyzed: the main features of disciplinary penalty, separating it from the other types of law responsibility are characterized; the conception of contravene of labor discipline is proposed in brief; the conception of disciplinary punishment proposed; the types of disciplinary punishment, the setting up, appealing and liquidating course of disciplinary punishment are supplied. The third part is practical. The main purpose of this part is to analyze the cases in order to reveal the mistakes made in courts. In this part material and procedural law norms are used. In conclusion, one can notice that: the judgments of the Courts are legal, reasoned, comprehensive and motivated. The main problem in the Courts is the terms of heard cases, thats why the specialized labor Courts or specialized labor departments requirement of general competence in the Courts is inevitable. |
