| Abstract [eng] |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LITHUANIA’S AND LATVIA’S LAW INSTRUMENTS WHICH REGULATE EMPLOYEE’S PECUNIARY LIABILITY The topic of this article is to make circumstantial and comparative analysis of Lithuania’s and Latvia’s law instruments which regulate employee’s pecuniary liability. It’s important that Lithuania’s and Latvia’s juridical system is close to each other. Taking this fact into account, it is easier to find similarities and differences in the legislation, which regulate pecuniary liability between employee and employer. The analysis of law instruments may help to find a better regulation in confusing situations. The purpose of employees’ pecuniary liability institute is to compensate damage to an employer, which was caused due to unlawful actions or breach of duty by an employee. According to this it is important to coordinate interests of employee and employer. The regulation of this institute was researched using a comparative method. It is also researched the origin of this institute, it’s singularity, the circumstances of it’s usage; the types of employee’s pecuniary liability and subject’s features are examined. It was aspired to identify problems in legislation and practical application of employee’s pecuniary liability issues, as well as to present proposals regarding corrections of legal deficiencies and improvement of legislation to the legislator in the present graduation work. |
