| Abstract [eng] |
Theoretical and Practical Problems of Refusal to Initiate a Pre-Trial Investigation. This article deals with theoretical and practical problems of refusal to initiate a pre-trial investigation. The first part of this work deals with problematic aspects of initiating a pre-trial investigation, anatomizing Lithuanian ant foreign countries legal acts, court practice and doctrine. The idea of united and separated pre-trial investigation as an episode is being settled down. Besides, this part of work speaks about regulation of initiating pre-trial investigation according legal acts and other binding acts. The conclusion is being formed that Lithuania is chosen the conception of united episode of pre-trial investigation. While changing legal acts which regulate pre-trial investigation, Lithuanian criminal procedure law achieved goal, solving some problems which existed in initiating pre-trial investigation, coursing the effectiveness of pre-trial investigation. The next episode speaks about refusal to initiate a pre-trial investigation. This part deals with the aspects according which pre-trial investigation can not be initiated. What is more, the documents of procedure and the system of appealing are revealed. Summing everything up, changing the grounds of refusing to initiate a pre-trial investigation, solved some problems which existed before new enactment. Besides, the practice of refusing to initiate pre-trial investigation became more effective. On the contrary, this legal act can be improved in other aspects. In the end of this work the conclusion, literature list and summary are given. |
